History > History of War > WW2
Radcliffe Takashi Onishi
Mar 26 · Last update 5 mo. ago.
What country was the worst in the World War 2?
WW1 turn Europe into the main battlefield. In comparison, WW2, Asia (etc.) became a battlefield, and many countries were involved. Do you think what caused the worst, including the country, organization, individuals? I think that World War II is hard to say which country was bad. Especially, I think that there is a gap also in the eyes of the victorious side and the defeated nation. So I hope to find various perspectives.
Stats of Viewpoints
The Soviet Union, for a flagrant disregard for human rights both before, after and during the war
0 agrees
0 disagrees
America for using the war to intentionally test weapons of mass destruction
2 agrees
0 disagrees
the victorious WWI country
2 agrees
0 disagrees
The cause of WW2 is Nazi Germany.
0 agrees
1 disagrees
Japan (Imperialism)
2 agrees
0 disagrees
Viewpoints
Add New Viewpoint
The Soviet Union, for a flagrant disregard for human rights both before, after and during the war

Although the Soviet Union suffered the highest number of casualties in the Second World War some of the worst atrocities in history were carried out by the Soviet Union around the time of the Second World War. Furthermore, the Soviet Union rejection of Imperial Russia’s signing of The Hague Convention served to justify them committing war crimes, and it also served to rationalise the mistreatment of Red Army POWs by the Nazis. The total number of life lost at the hands of the Soviet Union is highly debated and very difficult to attribute an accurate number to. The wide scale and level of violence, torture, starvation and disappearances are so far reaching it is almost unfathomable, this makes the Soviet Union the worst country not only in World War Two but quite possibly in world history.

Agree
Disagree
America for using the war to intentionally test weapons of mass destruction

It is widely held by historians that Japan was on the verge of surrender following large scale bombings of Japanese cities with conventional arms by America. Several historical revisionists recognise the US desire to instil fear in the Soviets and curb the expansion of communism. It is also recognised to have failed when you consider the fact that the Soviet Union then fast tracked their development of nuclear weapons, carrying out their own tests just four years later.

America’s choice to drop atomic bombs on civilian populations then could be described more as a weapons test, not with the goal of ending the war but to send a message to the world, that its military was technologically dominant and it would dominate the post war period. The two most shocking events in WWII were genocide and the use of weapons of mass destruction on civilians. The latter horrific act should be recognised with as much gravity as genocide, but America has never even come close to recognising the victims, never mind an apology; and the US perpetuates this hero narrative claiming the use of atom bombs on japanese civilians ended the Second World War.

Agree
Disagree
Latest conversation
Daniel Halliday
Jul 24
Approved
DH edited this paragraph
It is widely held by historians that Japan was on the verge of surrender following large scale bombings of Japanese cities with conventional arms by America. Several historical revisionists recognise the US desire to instil fear in the Soviets and curb the expansion of communism. It is also recognised to have failed when you consider the fact that the Soviet Union then fast tracked their development of nuclear weapons, carrying out their own tests just four years later.
the victorious WWI country

The Versailles Treaty of the victorious WWI country was too strict in Germany, which caused the German economy to become rough and enabling the rise of the Nazis.

France in particular was especially overzealous in trying to cripple the German economy in return for on-going boarder issues. Although historians still debate whether the allies demanding reparations of 132 billion gold marks (US$33 billion) was fair or not. However, it is undoubtable the the economy was a large part of hitlers assent into power.

While the allied powers may not have committed the worst atrocities in the Second World War, they may well be the root cause of the whole conflict. While economic sanctions or reparations may not seem as openly violent and aggressive compared to warfare (or indeed war crimes) when used to cripple a countries economy the consequences can be both aggressive and violent.

Agree
Disagree
Latest conversation
Daniel Halliday
Jul 24
Approved
DH edited this paragraph
While the allied powers may not have committed the worst atrocities in the Second World War, they may well be the root cause of the whole conflict. While economic sanctions or reparations may not seem as openly violent and aggressive compared to warfare (or indeed war crimes) when used to cripple a countries economy the consequences can be both aggressive and violent.
The cause of WW2 is Nazi Germany.

Under the Weimar Constitution, Hitler formed the Nazi Party and led Germany again to rearmament, and caused social change in the country, with Hitler turning economic worries into ethnic hatred.

Nazi Germany invaded neighbouring countries like Poland, France, and the Soviet Union... This resulted in the extension of war across Europe, a war in which German Forces carried out hundreds of massacres that constitute war crimes. Not to mention committing one of the worst organised mass murders in history, killing six million Jews, Romani, Serbs, Poles, criminals, prisoners, and disabled people in the name of Eugenics.

Furthermore, the development of the atomic bomb, which promptly progressed, was caused by the fact that the United States was so concerned about the development of the situation in Europe caused by Nazi Germany.

Agree
Disagree
Latest conversation
Daniel Halliday
Jul 24
Approved
DH edited this paragraph
Under the Weimar Constitution, Hitler formed the Nazi Party and led Germany again to rearmament, and caused social change in the country, with Hitler turning economic worries into ethnic hatred.
Japan (Imperialism)

Japan carried out an imperial conquest and increased its colonies in Asia. Japans military expansion started in the late 19th century acquiring first control over Taiwan and later Korea moving into areas of Northeast China, which began the first Sino-Japanese war in 1895. The Empire acquired more territory following the removal of the German colonialism following the First World War, and later used the Second World War to colonise most of South-East Asia. As a result, many Asian countries struggled for liberation from imperialism and began to confront the Empire of Japan.

Furthermore, Japan's imperialistic policy hurt many civilians. Even now, many people have a searing memory of Japanese imperialism and the numerous massacres and war crimes that came with it. Ultimately, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and started a brutal war (WW2).

Agree
Disagree
Latest conversation
Masaki Shibutani
Jul 23
Rejected
Oh...sorry. English translation is Sino.
Shibu edited this paragraph
Japan carried out an imperial conquest and increased its colonies in Asia. Japans military expansion started in the late 19th century acquiring first control over Taiwan and later Korea moving into areas of Northeast China, which began the first Shina-Japanese war in 1895. The Empire acquired more territory following the removal of the German colonialism following the First World War, and later used the Second World War to colonise most of South-East Asia. As a result, many Asian countries struggled for liberation from imperialism and began to confront the Empire of Japan.
Translate